A future proof codec & resolution size w/ the Bridge

WarpNote

I'm finally starting to build my own visuals library. I do my own visuals and most of my files are stored out as ProRes 422 1080p video. Practice setup at home, I will normally remove the left CDJ for the external DVI display when working in ME -> http://www.flickr.com/photos/audun_notevarp/6762442857/in/photostream So in that regards, I'm trying to balance file sizes, best perceivable quality, and computer performance. I'm eventually looking to use ME and the Bridge at the same time, so please take this into consideration. My current computer for playing out is an older non unibody 2.4ghz dual core 2, but I'll get a new mbp 15" (high res version) this spring when I'm ready to take my visuals public. I also have a new i7 mbp 17" for video & animation work, so I'll set this up for testing. 17" is a bit too much for bringing to the club IMO. So, basically I'm looking at Apple intermediate Codec vs H.264, and the highest possible resolution while running stable with the Bridge. Please share your experience. Thanks, WarpNote

Nick

I haven't really done any tests recently to compare codecs at HD resolutions. Personally, I would probably try to get something working with H.264 before trying Apple Intermediate Codec. But, well, some of that will be dependent on where you're streaming your videos from (i.e. an internal or external hard-drive).

WarpNote

Thanks Nick! I'll go with h264, down-ressed to 720p for now. The old mbp has a 1TB internal, might have to go for a FW external though. Off to more testing... :D

codee

Warpnote If you 17 inch has thunderbolt you might want to reconsider using it at gigs. i use my 17 out all the time. but NEVER put it infront of me. I think that a DJ fopa now. it always gose off to one side so i can see the people im playing too. BUt if you really want to run HD video thunderbolt drives are the way to go.